What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is
there? May it never be! 15 For He says to Moses, "I WILL HAVE MERCY
ON WHOM I HAVE MERCY, AND I WILL HAVE COMPASSION ON WHOM I HAVE
COMPASSION." 16 So then it does not depend on the man who wills or
the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. 17 For the Scripture
says to Pharaoh, "FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO
DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED
THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH." 18 So then He has mercy on whom He
desires, and He hardens whom He desires.

We pick up where we left off three weeks ago. Let's review what
we saw in Romans 9:14-16. The question of God's justice was raised
in verse 14 because Paul taught in Romans 9:6-13 that God chooses -
elects - unconditionally who will believe and undeservingly be
saved, and who will rebel and deservingly perish.

The terrible reality of perishing people had been raised in
verse 3 where Paul was grieving over his Jewish kinsmen who, as he
says, are "cursed and cut off from Christ." How can God's word and
covenant with Israel stand if so many individual Israelites are
unbelieving and therefore perishing?

Paul answers in verse 6 that not all those who belong physically
to Israel are truly Israel. Then he explains with the examples of
Isaac and Ishmael, on the one hand, and Jacob and Esau, on the
other hand, that within Israel there has been a remnant "chosen by
grace" (Romans 11:5). Isaac not Ishmael was chosen. Jacob not Esau
was chosen. That's Paul's explanation of why there were so many of
his kinsmen who were unbelieving and therefore accursed and cut off
from Christ. It was ultimately owing to God's free and
unconditional election of some and not others.

So Paul makes this explicit in Romans 9:11-13. "Though they
[Jacob and Esau] were not yet born and had done nothing either good
or bad [this is where we see the unconditionality] - in order that
God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but
because of his call - 12 she [Rebecca] was told, 'The older will
serve the younger.' 13 As it is written, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I
hated.'" God chose Jacob and rejected Esau. And he did this before
they were born or had done anything good or evil. That's what we
mean by unconditional election.

Paul knew that in his day and ours people would stumble over
this. People would say that God is unjust - unrighteous - to choose
freely and unconditionally who would believe and be undeservingly
saved and who would rebel and deservingly perish. So he poses the
question that he has, no doubt, heard many times in response to his
teaching. He asks in verse 14, "What shall we say then? There is no
injustice with God, is there?" And he answers: "May it never be!"
God is not unjust in unconditional election.

Why not? That is what we began to talk about three weeks ago,
starting with verses 15-16. I'll try to sum it up and add the part
I promised. The part we looked at last time was how the quote from
Exodus 33:19 functions in verse 15. "For He says to Moses, 'I will
have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom
I have compassion.'" This is given as an argument for God's justice
or righteousness in unconditional election. "There is no
unrighteousness with God is there? May it never be! FOR, God says
to Moses, 'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have
compassion on whom I have compassion.'" How does that argument
work?

The First Key: God's Glory Includes His Absolute Freedom in
Election

The context of Exodus 33:19 is all important. This statement of
the freedom of God in mercy is given by Moses as an expression and
manifestation of God's name, his character, his glory. (We saw that
last time.) That's why Paul chose to cite what looks like a simple
restatement of the problem: he has mercy on whom he wills.
He is free and not decisively constrained by
anything outside himself. In the context, this freedom is shown to
be the very essence of what it means to be God. It is an expression
of his name: Yahweh: I am who I am. I have mercy on whom I have
mercy. That is my name. That is my glory. That is what it means to
be God.

The Second Key: The Essence of God's Righteousness Is His
Commitment to Uphold and Display the Infinite Value of His Glory
and His Name

That was one key to understanding Paul's argument for God's
righteousness in the freedom of election. The other key is Paul's
understanding of God's righteousness. Last time I simply gave you
that understanding and promised I would give some support this
time. I said, "God's righteousness is essentially his unswerving
allegiance to his own name - his own glory. God is righteous to the
degree that he upholds and displays the honor of his name. He is
righteous when he values most what is most valuable, and what is
most valuable is his own glory." Now, is this the way Paul
understands the essence of God's righteousness?

Yes. One place to see this is Romans 3:23-25. "All have sinned
and fall short of the glory of God." Notice that sin is defined in
relation to the glory of God. Sin belittles the glory of God. It
makes God look less valuable by desiring something else more. Then
Paul describes God's remedy for that derision of his glory. Verse
24: ". . . and [they] are justified by his grace as a gift, through
the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as
a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to
show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had
passed over former sins."

What we see here is that God sent Jesus to die ("by his blood"),
and that by dying the righteousness of God could be vindicated and
his anger could be propitiated and sinners who had belittled God's
glory could be justified by faith alone. Why did God's
righteousness need to be vindicated in this way? Because (v. 25b)
he had passed over sins. That is, he had acted as though the
derision of his glory didn't matter, and thus his righteousness,
his allegiance to that glory, is called into question. He acted as
though his glory was of little worth. But it is of infinite worth.
And God would be untrue, he would be unrighteous, not to uphold and
display the true value of his glory. Therefore, in order to justify
sinners (like us!) who belittle his glory, and yet not himself
belittle his own glory (in acting as though it didn't matter), he
shows the infinite value of his glory by vindicating it with the
death of his own Son who died for his Father's glory (John
12:27-28).

Therefore, what Romans 3:23-25 shows (as well as 3:1-8 and other
places) is that God's righteousness is, at its essence, God's
unswerving allegiance to the infinite value of his own glory - his
own name. It's his unwavering commitment to uphold and display his
glory and his name.

Paul's Conclusion: There Is No Unrighteousness with God in
Unconditional Election

Now with these two keys: we open Paul's argument. The first key
from the quotation of Exodus 33:19 in Romans 9:15 is that God's
glory, his name, includes his absolute being and his absolute
freedom in election. "I am who I am." "I have mercy on whom I have
mercy." That is his glory, his name. That is what it means to be
God.

The second key is that God's righteousness is his unwavering
commitment always to uphold and display the infinite value of his
glory and his name.

The conclusion that Paul draws is this: therefore there is no
unrighteousness with God in unconditional election. When God acts
in this way, choosing the beneficiaries of his mercy freely and
without any constraint from human willing or human acting, he is
upholding and displaying his name and his glory. And this is the
very essence of his righteousness.

And so he restates the unconditionality of election in Romans
9:16: "So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man
who runs, but on God who has mercy." God's ultimate choice of who
will believe and undeservingly be saved, and who will rebel and
deservingly perish, is not based on human volition or human
behavior.

Then Paul turns to another Old Testament passage to give further
support for his conviction. He cites Exodus 9:16 in Romans 9:17.
And then he states his conviction again in verse 18. Verse 18 says,
"So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He
desires." You can see how similar this is to verse 15, "I will have
mercy on whom I have mercy." But here the opposite of mercy is also
mentioned, namely hardening. "He has mercy on whom He desires, and
He hardens whom He desires."

You see what Paul is doing here. He had said in Romans 9:13 not
only, "Jacob I loved," but also, "Esau I hated." One is chosen and
the other is given over to become wicked. (See the sermon from
12-8-02 and the
context of Romans 9:13 in Malachi 1:4, "wicked.") There are two
sides to God's choosing, and verse 18 picks that up: "He has mercy
on whom He wills, and He hardens whom He wills." If the mercy is
ultimately unconditional, the hardening is ultimately
unconditional.
That's what verse 18 adds, simply repeating what
verse 11 had said, "Before they were born or had done anything good
or evil," God chose who would be the beneficiary of his mercy and
who would not.

Ultimately, God does not save or condemn because of constraints
laid on him by the willing or doing of man. God is free. He acts
according to his own wise purposes to uphold and display the
fullness of his glory.

God Hardens Whom He Will

To show from Scripture that God "hardens whom he wills," Paul
turns to the great old story of the Exodus from Egypt. And he
chooses one verse from those 10 chapters, Exodus 9:16, and quotes
it here in verse 17: "For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, 'For this
very purpose I raised you up, to demonstrate my power in you, and
that my name might be proclaimed throughout the whole earth.'"

Why this verse from all the verses that he could have chosen
that speak of hardening? Why choose one that does not even refer to
hardening, and then draw out the conclusion: "He hardens whom he
wills" (v. 18)? There are very profound reasons. They relate to
God's freedom and to God's great global purposes of world
evangelization. But that we will save for next week. I want to
devote the entire message next week to going back with you to the
story of the Exodus and seeing what the Old Testament teaches about
the purpose of God in hardening Pharaoh.

But to draw to a close this morning and move to the Lords'
Supper, I want to step back, get the big picture and make some
clarifying comments. Unconditional election does not mean that our
final salvation or condemnation is unconditional.

Unconditional Election Does Not Conflict with Real
Conditions

It is by faith we are saved (Romans 10:9), and it is because of
hard and impenitent hearts that we receive wrath and perish (Romans
2:5). There is a real condition that has to be met for
justification - namely faith in Jesus Christ. And there are real
conditions that have to be met for damnation, namely, hardness and
unbelief. There is a real choice that we make which unites us with
Christ so that we are clothed with his righteousness and have
eternal life. And there is real choice that we make - in Adam and
in ourselves - which is resistant to the truth and deserving of
condemnation.

Unconditional election, which Paul teaches here, does not
contradict any of that. What unconditional election teaches is that
God chooses who will be in those two groups - who will believe and
undeservingly be saved, and who will rebel and deservingly
perish.

Implications

There are two huge implications for us this morning.

1) We should believe on Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior and
Treasure. "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and
believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will
be saved" (Romans 10:9). Don't be wiser than the word of God. Don't
say: God chooses whomever he wills, I don't need to choose him."
The Bible says, "Choose this day whom you will serve" (Joshua
24:15). Don't say, "Why should I take hold of Christ if he takes
hold of me?" Rather say what Paul says, "I take hold of Christ
because he has taken hold of me" (Philippians 3:12). Don't be wiser
than the word of God. "God has made foolish the wisdom of the
world" (1 Corinthians 1:20). Humble yourself and turn to Christ and
be saved.

2) Beware, when you have believed, that you not boast, as if
your believing were ultimately your own doing. Instead be thankful
and say with the apostle Paul, "I thank God that from the heart I
have become obedient to the teaching of Christ" (Romans 6:17).

The Bible makes clear that God saves us in a way that excludes
all boasting. Boasting is doubly excluded. It is excluded by the
principle of faith and by the truth of unconditional election.

Boasting excluded by FAITH. Romans 3:27, "Then
what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law?
By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith." Faith excludes
boasting because it looks away from all human distinctives
(including itself!) and receives free grace.

Boasting excluded by unconditional ELECTION. 1
Corinthians 1:27-29, "God chose what is foolish in the world to
shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the
strong; 28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even
things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, 29 so
that no human being might boast in the presence of God." God's
choosing, God's free and inscrutable election removes boasting from
those who really feel its preciousness.

Therefore, believe on Christ, and when you do, thank him. Let
him who boasts boast in the Lord.